<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.onthedocket.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>On the Docket - </title>
 <link>http://www.onthedocket.org/recently-decided</link>
 <description>All persons interested in the business before the Honorable, the Supreme Court of the United States, are admonished to draw near and give their attention for the Court is about to enter its 2007-08 term.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Divided court backs Navy in sonar case (Nov. 12, 2008)</title>
 <link>http://www.onthedocket.org/articles/2008/11/12/divided-court-backs-navy-sonar-case-nov-12-2008</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;In the first ruling of the new term, a divided Supreme Court held today that the U.S. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.onthedocket.org/articles/2008/11/12/divided-court-backs-navy-sonar-case-nov-12-2008&quot;&gt;More...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.onthedocket.org/taxonomy/term/133">Opinion Announced</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 19:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jkoons</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27879 at http://www.onthedocket.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Justices rule on case concerning contracts negotiated during the 2001 Western energy crisis (June 26, 2008)</title>
 <link>http://www.onthedocket.org/articles/2008/06/27/justices-rule-case-concerning-contracts-negotiated-during-2001-western-energy-cr</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The Supreme Court asked the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and a federal appeals court on Thursday to review the conclusions both reached about whether electricity contracts signed during the &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.onthedocket.org/articles/2008/06/27/justices-rule-case-concerning-contracts-negotiated-during-2001-western-energy-cr&quot;&gt;More...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.onthedocket.org/taxonomy/term/133">Opinion Announced</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jkoons</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27834 at http://www.onthedocket.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Court invalidates Millionaire&#039;s Amendment (June 26, 2008)</title>
 <link>http://www.onthedocket.org/articles/2008/06/26/court-invalidates-millionaires-amendment-june-26-2008</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;On the last day of its term, a closely-divided Supreme Court struck down the so-called Millionaire&#039;s Amendment to the 2002 campaign finance law. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.onthedocket.org/articles/2008/06/26/court-invalidates-millionaires-amendment-june-26-2008&quot;&gt;More...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.onthedocket.org/taxonomy/term/133">Opinion Announced</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jkoons</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27833 at http://www.onthedocket.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Court strikes down D.C. gun ban (June 26, 2008)</title>
 <link>http://www.onthedocket.org/articles/2008/06/26/court-strikes-down-dc-gun-ban-june-26-2008</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;On its final day of the term, a Supreme Court divided along familiar ideological lines broke its seven decade silence regarding the central meaning of the Second Amendment when it struck down Washi &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.onthedocket.org/articles/2008/06/26/court-strikes-down-dc-gun-ban-june-26-2008&quot;&gt;More...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.onthedocket.org/taxonomy/term/133">Opinion Announced</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jkoons</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27832 at http://www.onthedocket.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Court allows criminal defendant to exclude victim&#039;s testimony (June 25, 2008)</title>
 <link>http://www.onthedocket.org/articles/2008/06/25/court-allows-criminal-defendant-exclude-victims-testimony-june-25-2008</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A murder defendant has the right to exclude the testimony of his victim, the Supreme Court held in a case that sheds light on the state of Confrontation Clause doctrine.  &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.onthedocket.org/articles/2008/06/25/court-allows-criminal-defendant-exclude-victims-testimony-june-25-2008&quot;&gt;More...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.onthedocket.org/taxonomy/term/133">Opinion Announced</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jkoons</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27831 at http://www.onthedocket.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Justices limit tribal courts&#039; jurisdiction (June 25, 2008)</title>
 <link>http://www.onthedocket.org/articles/2008/06/25/justices-limit-tribal-courts-jurisdiction-june-25-2008</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;In a case clarifying the scope of Indian tribal courts&#039; jurisdiction over non-members, a divided Supreme Court held that these courts do not have authority to hear lawsuits involving non-tribal mem &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.onthedocket.org/articles/2008/06/25/justices-limit-tribal-courts-jurisdiction-june-25-2008&quot;&gt;More...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.onthedocket.org/taxonomy/term/133">Opinion Announced</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jkoons</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27830 at http://www.onthedocket.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Divided court rejects death penalty for child rape (June 25, 2008)</title>
 <link>http://www.onthedocket.org/articles/2008/06/25/divided-court-rejects-death-penalty-child-rape-june-25-2008</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A Supreme Court divided along ideological lines struck down the constitutionality of Louisiana&#039;s law permitting imposition of the death penalty for the crime of child rape. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.onthedocket.org/articles/2008/06/25/divided-court-rejects-death-penalty-child-rape-june-25-2008&quot;&gt;More...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.onthedocket.org/taxonomy/term/133">Opinion Announced</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jkoons</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27829 at http://www.onthedocket.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Court cuts judgment in Exxon Valdez case (June 25, 2008)</title>
 <link>http://www.onthedocket.org/articles/2008/06/25/court-cuts-judgment-exxon-valdez-case-june-25-2008</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The Supreme Court has cut the final bill that the Exxon Mobil Corporation must pay for the 1989 accident that caused the Exxon Valdez to spill 11 million gallons of oil into Prince William Sound. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.onthedocket.org/articles/2008/06/25/court-cuts-judgment-exxon-valdez-case-june-25-2008&quot;&gt;More...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.onthedocket.org/taxonomy/term/133">Opinion Announced</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jkoons</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27828 at http://www.onthedocket.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Right to attorney begins soon after arrest (June 23, 2008)</title>
 <link>http://www.onthedocket.org/articles/2008/06/23/right-attorney-begins-soon-after-arrest-june-23-2008</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The Supreme Court refined the contours of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel in a civil rights suit where the plaintiff charged that he was denied an attorney during a non-prosecutorial court hea &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.onthedocket.org/articles/2008/06/23/right-attorney-begins-soon-after-arrest-june-23-2008&quot;&gt;More...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.onthedocket.org/taxonomy/term/133">Opinion Announced</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jkoons</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27826 at http://www.onthedocket.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Federal appellate courts cannot increase sentences sua sponte (June 23, 2008)</title>
 <link>http://www.onthedocket.org/articles/2008/06/23/federal-appellate-courts-cannot-increase-sentences-sua-sponte-june-23-2008</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Appellate courts do not have the authority to hike defendants&#039; sentences when the government has not asked them to do so, a divided Supreme Court ruled. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.onthedocket.org/articles/2008/06/23/federal-appellate-courts-cannot-increase-sentences-sua-sponte-june-23-2008&quot;&gt;More...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.onthedocket.org/taxonomy/term/133">Opinion Announced</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jkoons</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27825 at http://www.onthedocket.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
